Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Patch Job Health Care Reform

Thursday, February 4th, 2010

So, it looks like the democrats have ran into a major road bump on their dream ride to socializing health care. Now I’m not completely opposed to the intent and vision of what the democrats are trying to accomplish. In fact, part of me had hopes that they would come up with the dream solution that Obama always spoke of. Lower costs, insure everyone, and do it at no additional expense. The problem was, that it turned out to be as impossible as it sounds. But now that the democrats have lost the ability to ram a flawed incomplete piece of optimistically deceptive legislation through the senate they are refocusing on passing parts of the bill that sound good to both sides of the isle.

You have to remember once and a while that few poloticians get to where they are today by being brilliant at math or science. Most were elected for their ideolgical views, and their sparkeling resume, but most of all, because they begged and pleaded and raised a lot of money to spend begging and pleading people to vote for them. I worry that a complicated system required for a complete health care overhaul can not be pulled apart into a buffett table for senators to pick and choose their favorites. Most of the ugly parts to the reform bills only existed to make possible the more attractive offerings. I think it’s important now to take a step back and look ahead to where we are going with all of this.

Remember in highschool there was a certain group of grease monkey hot rodders who when given the opportunity to purchase their first car looked for a fixer upper? They would convince themselves that this was a golden opporutnity. If they purchased this 1983 Camaro with no engine and minor body damage, they could fix it up like new and sell it for a profit when they were done. How many times have you heard that logic from a sixteen year old boy? How many twenty year olds do you see driving around in a fully restored ten year old Camaro? Not many. Because this is what happens. You purchase a car for $3k and think that if you put $5 worth of parts into it and a lot of your own sweat and blood that you will end up with a car worth $10k. What really happens is you buy a car worth $3k and by the time you are $5k into the rebuild, you realize how far you are from completing and as you fix up one part of the car, the vehicle is also putting on miles and needing more and more maintenance.

When you go to sell the car, you learn that it is only worth $7k as an unfinished restorated not so classic 15 year old camaro. I get the feeling this is what’s going to happen to the health care reform. We will work real hard stripping the paint and priming the car, but never pick a color to paint it. And since we couldn’t afford the factory parts, we just went to the auto store and picked out the most affordable spoiler that is sitting on the shelf along with every other piece of gaudy cosmetic piece of bling we could get our hands on, just to keep the appearance up that we are fixing up the car.

If total reform wasn’t possible, then we can’t just pick the pieces that sounded good and get rid of the rest. The math just doesn’t work. If we want to take another look at this, the president should push for a new idea plan of gradual modifications to the system to focus on improving care and lowering costs using incentives and oversight, not just more insurance.

Oh Babylon, when will you ever learn

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

If you are not familiar with the history of Babylon, here is a quick history. The first government to spread it’s power across all civilization, it was a power full empire worthy of respect and mention when talking about the great powers of history. Much like other world powers to follow it, when it had finished conquering the known world, it looked to other feats to demonstrate it’s greatness and to keep it’s subjects busy. They set out to build a tower. Tower’s were not new to them architecturally,  but they wanted to create one so large, that they could reach out and touch the clouds. They wanted everyone who sees it to see their brilliance and power.

As the story goes, they were doing pretty well. So well, that they had gotten God’s attention. God, speaking to himself as he commonly must do, being that the only other being worthy of having a conversation with is himself, said to himself, “We must stop them”. He continued to explain to himself, “If they are allowed to complete this, then they will think they are truly capable of anything.” At first glance, this seems like a real jerkish thing for God to think. But if you have ever had children, and you see them doing something crazy and daring, your first thought is “oh, I hope they don’t fall”. But when they don’t fall when you thought they would, you quickly realize the scary truth. If a child never gets hurt doing dangerous things, he never learns those boundaries and will continue to push out and pursue more dangerous stunts until he does more damage then a scraped knee. I think this is what God was thinking. Not that he didn’t want them to do well, but that if they continued in this manner of unstoppable pride and confidence, that it would in fact be their downfall. Or maybe God was just being a bully, who really knows.

So God stopped work on the tower by changing their languages and moving them to new locations. Kind of a strange story. I imagine a SIMS game where God just picks up SIM characters and physically moved them, but it also could just be that people got sick of communication failures and moved on. The story explains the biblical history of how so many people groups developed speaking different languages across the world. If you think you are to intellectual to believe a story like that, then tell me this. Since science has already proven that all men are descend from one man, how did completely unique languages form? You would think that all languages would have closer commonality if we all developed out of one group. Interesting thought, but not the thought I want to discuss today.
Have you seen the latest and greatest achievements of man when it comes to architectural height? The Burj Khalifa in Dubi which was just completed at the beginning of 2010 stands at 2,717 ft tall. That’s a little more than nine football fields. It now tops the scale of largest man made structure knocking down the current reigning champion which was a radio tower in North Dakota. Nearly twice the size of the Empire state building, you can see the entire city of Dubi from the top of the tower.

With 160 floors, it really is something to look at. I thought after 911 the world would have backed off of building super tall sky scrapers, but apparently they believe that placing a mosque on the 158th floor will deter Islamic terrorist from trying to knock it down. But even if they built the safest structure in history, I’m not sure you could ever convince someone to lease the top 60 floors with all the fears of working  that high up. Not to mention the 15-30 minute elevator ride once it get’s populated and people are getting on and off. What a hassle. And just so you could look outside  and have an awesome view? Buy a poster! Dubi is already suffering from some pretty serious financial problems due to the world financial climate and the amount they have been investing in infrastructure.  But other than the financial worries, there have been no major setbacks during construction.

Since this latest achievement of tower building is much grander then that of the early babylon empire, that leaves us with a few thoughts about God’s actions and current lack of actions concerning tower building.

  1. God isn’t concerned for our saftey, because we are older and smarter and better at building things. This is very unlikely, because if anything we have proven with this new structure that we don’t build things better and stronger, just cheaper and faster. The building designer was quoted as saying “I didn’t know how tall I was going to make it. We just kept adding to the top until we couldn’t any more.” I’m sorry, but that is also my toddlers methodology for building towers, and his don’t last very long either.
  2. God is just sitting back and allowing us to set ourselves up to fail. He sees that we didn’t learn the easy way, so he’s going to allow us to learn the hard way.
  3. God just doesn’t care any more. And I don’t mean this in a dark agnostic way. I mean he is still there, and still the loving God we all know. But when see a man smoking a cigarette and walking into moving traffic, you don’t mention to him that cigarettes are the leading cause of lung cancer. Nope, he is going to die in a matter of minutes, so things like lifestyle choices, bad habits, pride and dangerously tall towers don’t really warrant a conversation. This is a scary thought if you think about it.

Whatever God’s reasons, he hasn’t given any a language lobotomy to anyone over it yet. One thing is for sure though. People haven’t changed one bit. All our self praise over how evolved we are, and how we live in an age of enlightenment. We are still guys in rudimentary garments, shoving monoliths up in the loose soil so that everyone can see how gifted we are. Something to consider. The tallest Non-man-made structure is Mount Everest,  standing at 29,029 Feet. Nearly 10 times the size of the Burj Khalifa. So we may be able to pat ourselves on the back for this one, but I wouldn’t expect to get many kudos from the creator on it. Plus, I have a feeling that Everest will last longer.

Burj Khalifa

“Happy Marriages.” – That’s so gay.

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

I’m writing this to address the liberal minded people out there and the moderates who are quickly jumping on the band wagon of supporting the gay marriage movement in hopes that you would read this and open your perspective on the issue.

Gay Marriage isn’t just a civil rights issue, It’s a separation of church and state issue.

For those of you who don’t know your history, marriage is an institution that was ordained by God and incorporated into religious practice since the beginning of civilization, and then much much later adopted by the federal government to identify families for tax and legal reasons. If you don’t like that the government piggy backing it’s legislation on religious institutions like marriage, then that is a different issue then modifying the definition of marriage. You could change the tax laws and allow for contractual arrangements for all those instances that require legal relationships. This could be useful to more than just homosexuals. But you CAN’T redefine a religious sacrament that predates the constitution to make yourself feel better.

If you disagree, as a homosexual, then I have one challenge for you. Procreate.

There has been much work done in the past decade to provide equal rights to everyone despite their sexual preference, with the exception of pedophiles, animal lovers, and  polygamists. There are some issues that really need to be dealt with when it comes to health care decisions and identifying next of kin. But it seems like a simple next of kin document and some form of power of attorney document would take care of most of those issues. This is where the concept of civil unions has come in to provide for those issues in one document. But in America, the gay movement says that that is not enough. Why? European gays don’t mind civil unions. Mainly because they don’t care much about God or what Godly people think of them. In America, this generation of homosexuals is looking for more than rights. They are asking for everyone’s approval. They want to be told it’s more than allowable, that it’s normal. But it’s not normal. It’s not equal to a man and wife. You can have equal rights, but you are not guaranteed equality. If you disagree, as a homosexual, then I have one challenge for you. Procreate. Show me how you contribute to the whole of society through re-population.  See, in the Christian belief, marriage was designed for the purpose of producing offspring.  To “Go forth and multiply” was the command by God to Adam and Eve. You may say that you don’t believe in the bible or in God all together, so these arguments don’t hold up. But then I ask you, why are you trying to change the religious institution of marriage? Why not be content with the rights and liberties of civil unions.

The reason that so many are moving towards  supporting the gay ajenda for marriage rights, is that they have fallen into a slipper slope argument that begins with a bad premise.

  1. Gay people are a minority group like racial minorities, who are being oppressed because of they are different.
  2. Civil Unions are a lesser status then marriage and an insult to equality.
  3. Non-support of Gay marriage makes you a close minded bigot raciest hate monger.
  4. Gay marriage doesn’t harm anyone, so  why bother being against it.

If it was genetic, they would be extinct by now…

First of all, I have to admit, I’m a white guy in his early 30′s, so I’ve never experienced real racism first hand. But I do love to hear the stories of the stories of the sit-ins and demonstrations that revolutionized our countries race relations. America was wrong about a bunch of issues when it came to interacting with different cultures. We destroyed the Indians culture to dominate it with one we were more comfortable with. We engaged in the heinous act of slave trade and for a long time after looked down upon dark skinned people and pigion holed their potential. We poked fun and stereotyped the Irish when they migrated to our shores. We vilify Latinos for political posturing. We suck at race relations as a country. But to measure the struggles of homosexuality up to the struggles of racism, to me, feels like an insult to the civil rights movement. People are  not born gay. This is a story some would like for you to believe, but the tough truth is that it is just a sexual and relational preference. It isn’t a genetic disposition, because that’s impossible, since gay people don’t pass genes down. If it was genetic, they would be extinct by now, or at least in an ever decreasing population.

Homosexuality is more comparable to the hippie movement of the late 60′s and early 70′s. It’s a lifestyle, not a race. And people hated hippies too, and even kicked them out of stores and restaurants. But that wasn’t racism. That was seeing someone who’s culture and values  were perceived as a danger to you  and your offspring and reacting to protect your culture and values. And now, several centuries later, we can all agree that the drug and free love atmosphere of that movement wasn’t all that they had hoped it would be and did in fact do a lot of damage  to those who got lost in it.

Some hard line conservatives are bothered by the fact that I’m okay with civil  unions. My feelings are that as long as they don’t try to mess  with my rights and religious practices, then I have no  right to oppose them because I believe it to be immoral. I’m comforted by the fact that my beliefs are based on principles that have survived this kind of thing in the past and will outlast this phase of history as well. Allowing for civil unions won’t turn any more people gay, just as  not allowing them doesn’t stop homosexual behavior. But I do have issue with messing with the identity of changing the definition of marriage. I want my children to grow up seeing marriage as  a sacred and life changing event that is the celebration of the beginning of a new family.

it’s a slippery slope when the government starts defining religious institutions

I don’t blame homosexuals for the downfall of marriage. It has been under attack for a long time by the culture off divorce and separation. But that doesn’t mean we can further distort it’s meaning. It means that now, more then ever, we need  to stand up for it and defend it from harm.

Who does it really hurt? It might not seem like much if you are not a person of faith, or hold anything to be sacred. But it’s a slippery slope when the government starts defining religious institutions and legislating who is allowed to partake in them. Will the next step be laws that define who is eligible for salvation. Who can be baptized and how. The government has no place in that. And in case you didn’t know, the bible is very clear on this. Those eligible for salvation are everyone. Including gays, rapist, murders, and even overly opinionated jerks like me.

If you think I have it completely wrong, then leave a comment and tell me how. Or even better, write your 1000 word essay on the issue and submit it to fickled.com. But whatever you say, don’t call me close minded. I have given this a lot of thought, and being against something is not the definition of close minded.

What I learned from 2009

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Americans love a good revolution

When Iranians started protesting and rioting over the rigged presidential elections in their country it probably would not have gotten the attention of the United States public as much as it did, if it hadn’t been for the Iranians use of social media like twitter. It was inspiring to see someone actually find a noble use for this technology that we use to inform the world about the food we just ate or to scream into space our disdain and frustrations for our technology that we use to update our twitter accounts.

It’s not how you land or take off, it’s how you crash a plane that makes you a great pilot

The captain who landed in the Hudson. It was quick thinking and good piloting. Makes you wonder how other pilots would react. Goes to show you though, that history doesn’t judge you by the long term of your career, but by that one moment in time when you were thrust into a situation. If he had been a pilot for 2 years or 20, he would have been a hero either way.

Reality Television is destroying families

If you watched the balloon boy fiasco unfold, then you probably share my disgust for the parents role in the whole thing. The worse thing about that whole story was that if it had unfolded a little differently, it might have worked and we would be enjoying a new season of crazy balloon family premiering in 2010. Fortunately the media has handled it pretty well by not giving them any more attention after the hoax was unveiled. Although it was probably more out of anger over being the target of a hoax, then the moral responsibility on society.

Kanye West is a punk

Enough said. PUNK!

The media loves an epidemic just a little too much

With the 24hour news cycle we need more Tiger Woods fiascos to distract the media. With nothing else to cover, they will just give live updates on the same national story again and again looking at it from every different angle until they have driven the average viewer to become a hypochondriac.

Chickens are worth more then the stock market investments

So we are doing better now, but for a while there, everyones portfolio took a pretty big plunge. For young guys, it wasn’t too bad. For those who draw from retirement, it was devastating. I learned that at a certain age, I should take out my retirement and buy a farm. Because when the markets crash around you, an egg is still an egg and probably a dozen eggs is a couple dollars. If the egg market crashes though, you can still eat eggs until you have a heart attack.

Don’t fear the liberals taking over the governemt

I’m beginning to think it’s not possible for liberals to run the government. See, with conservatives its easy. Conservatives want to stay where they are, or move backwards. Liberals want to left, right, forward, hop, skip, and a few want to jump blindly off a cliff and see what happens. As a minority party, they can all agree to complain about the majority party doing it all wrong, but when in charge, they can’t decide what is right.

Apple Computers & Barak Obama

Friday, January 1st, 2010

The following is intended to be a light hearted comparison of the marketing and political positioning of Barak Obama and the Apple Computer company. I in no way mean any disrespect for our President. I think he’s a great guy and brilliant politician. Apple on the other hand, I apologize for nothing. You can go lay an egg.

I used to own an couple apple computers. I was told as a designer, that they were built for graphics and that buying any other computer would be something I would later regret. This was right around the time OS 9 was about to retire and give way to the future of computing, that would later become named after exotic cats, called OS X. Little did I know then the marketing gimic that I had fallen into. Neither did I at that time know that only 10 years later, a man would run for the office of president of the United States of America using the same pitch. Let me break down the spin.

IMac_Bondi_BlueSomething you’ve never seen before.

When the new iMac designs started coming out, they revolutionized the way people picture their computers. What was once an old dusty beige box that you covered and hid inside of a computer desk, was now a sexy colorful decoration that you would show off to all your friends. Barak Obama didn’t run his campaign to take full advantage of his sexy new look as the first black president, but it did become a major factor that drew attention away from other aspects of his political views. Liberals were so excited they didn’t realize how moderate he was and conservatives were afraid to confront him head on in fear that it would look like they were standing in the way of racial equality and the past 40 years of civil rights progress. But when you really ask the question, does the outside shell of your computer really make any difference in how well the computer will work, how fast it is, or if it will be there for you day in and day out. And when the glimmer of how different it looked new starts to fade, will it just end up looking like another old moldy politician who lied to you to get your vote.

Apple-pro-mouse1Over Simplification

When you purchase an iMac computer it comes with one page of instructions, usually only pictures. And honestly, if you have never used a computer before, they are tremendously simple to use. That is, until you want to do something with it that isn’t covered in the comic book instruction sheet. Take the mouse for instance. It only has one button. I as enamored with this simple mouse for a while. Until I realized how much productivity was lost by just using one button and having to now use two hands to do simple takes that were once easily accomplished with one.  Everything on a Macintosh is easy at the entry level, but as you become a more advanced user, it becomes cumbersome. Obama too made things sound a lot simpler then they really were. He may have actually been naive about things like health care reform and closing Guantanamo Bay, but it is much more likely that he just tricked us with pretty talk. When Obama speaks, he always presents the complex issues with hope and optimism, but never real hard answers. But his hope and optimism is so eloquently put that we often don’t notice when he glazes over a very important detail in a way that makes no sense at all.

Vague Promises, Unmeasurable Results

I was told that Apples were better for graphic design. When I researched to find proof or some kind of benchmarking for graphics, at the time, nothing standard between macs and PCs existed to quantify their speed. It’s like trying to compare a Porche 911 to a Ferrari 599 GTB and assuming that the Porche is faster based on the number applied to it being higher then 599. This is a ridiculous way to to compare cars, but unfortunately it is very difficult to test drive a Mac and PC side by side, since they are rarely carried in the same store. Much the same, as an incumbent in the 2008 elections every democrat ran on the same platform. “We will do better than it is currently being done.” And since every democrat also thoroughly agreed that the Bush years had been one step above pure crap, they only needed to promise two steps above pure crap. This marketing effort of saying the other team is so terrible and I will do it better is the most vague type or marketing, because what exactly are we promising. Apple did feel like they ran faster, but at the time most PC’s were multitasking 10 to 15 applications at a time and on Mac’s there were only 10 to 15 applications you could run on a Mac. When it came down to it, the hardware was about the same. A lot like what we got with Obama.

Although he ran on a “better than” campaign, I often find myself asking how any one decision he has made would have been different under the Bush administration. And the best part about running after Bush who’s approval ratings were so low on the way out, is that anything that goes wrong with the country for the next four years, can be blamed on the previous eight years. And if the public is gullible enough, we will give any credit for positive events that happen to the current administration

Security Logic

The latest craze for Macs is based around the lack of viruses for Macintosh operating systems and the low amount of bugs in the system. This is true. But not because the system is impenetrable. It would be like Obama claiming that the he was the better choice because he had never lost a war. If you haven’t been in a war, then you can’t loose. Macs are based on a Unix platform that is very secure and has a strong foundation. But Macs are going the same direction as PCs. More integration with other devices and software. This is where the bugs come in. Yes, if you bought a PC and never loaded any software that didn’t come from Microsoft, you may never experience a bug. But in the world of PCs, there is an abundant amount of software available. With all this software comes bugs. As Macs start to have more applications developed for it, there will be conflicts with resources leading to freeze ups. You of course wont’ get a blue screen of death, but instead a cute twirling disk cursor. When it comes to viruses, they are written for the bottom end users of the computer world. People who are likely to believe anything they read and click buttons that most advanced users would never click. Right now, most Mac users are more advanced users. At least, that was true until they started advertising that their OS couldn’t get viruses. Now everyone is getting their grandmother a Mac instead of a PC. College kids are buying Macs to take to school. Soon there will be a larger population of ignorant computer users all on Macs. Venerabilities are discovered on Macs, just like Windows comes out with patches, so do Macs. Right now those holes are patched before they can be misused, but that will not always be true. Once there are enough users for the Mac world, there will be a fair share of viruses. Only the problem will be doubled, because the users will believe they are not likely to get a virus. So they won’t be running antivirus, and they won’t be concerned over strange behavior or requests from the operating system.

The Growing Gray Lines

So years have now passed since my first purchases of an iBook and an iMac. I am now fully converted over to PCs because they are so much more cost effective if you know how computers work.  Of course now, there are people who buy PCs and load the Mac OS on to them. And Mac fanatics have learned new ways of running Windows based software. There is now a growing number of software application built on a universal model that runs on both platforms. The systems emulate each other’s designs to the point that it is difficult to decipher the differences. The truth is that software evolves based on the community that it serves. As the technology develops in different areas, it tends to merge together toward the most effective solution. The same is true for politicians. As the voter community builds and advances in communication, politics will move away from the extremes of left and right and closer to the middle. It might not be completely true for Barak Obama, but he did turn out to be a lot more moderate then either side anticipated. I could see a day when running for president has less to do with fundraising from the extremes of society and more to do with pleasing the wider public that lives somewhere in the vast gray middle of political thought.

Obama To Congress: Do it, or your fired in 2010.

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

There was a lot hanging on Obama’s speech to congress tonight. Some said it was going to be a defining moment in his presidency. He hit a home run. His speech was full of the reality that I’m not used to hearing. But Obama is apparently bright enough to realize that pretty talk and hope filled fluff speeches will only get you so far. He laid out several options and a hand full of compromises. He admitted to the troubled areas of his plan, but laid out clear paths to finding solutions. I really don’t think he could have done a better job. There are still parts of his ideology that I don’t think fit into human nature. Like you should never be sick in such a way that you go broke, “not in America”. Realistically, if you get sick enough, it will always leave you in a bad position financially, no matter how great your insurance is. But all said and done. Obama did a great job of leaving the full responsibility of making it happen in the hands of the senate and house.  Toward the end he hinted at “what will happen” if they don’t get this done. The most bipartisan thing about this bill will be the fact that republican or democrat, both will loose their job’s next year of they get in the way of a good piece of legislation. I’m a conservative republican, and I keep saying to my self, “I like this guy”. Will I vote for him in 1212… doubtful. But at least for now, I can say that he has surprised me on the way he is carrying out his promises during the campaign. Now to wait and see what bill get’s produced and what he has to say about the final product and how he will carry it out.

Oh and one more thing…

Dear state of South Carolina,

Please write your congressman, Joe Wilson and ask him to shut up. There is a time to debate and present facts on issues, but just yelling out “Liar” during a presidential address, is low class and doesn’t do well at representing your state to the rest of the nation. I would love to have Congressman Joe Wilson clearly and articulately explain his disagreement, and no doubt he will get the chance over the coming weeks, but I doubt he will have any evidence that warrants his outburst.

How dare he try to inspire our young people.

Tuesday, September 8th, 2009

There has been a lot of unnecessary contraversy over the President’s address to K-12 students today, especially in ulta conservitive states where the President didn’t recieve much support during the election. Honestly, I didn’t vote for him, and I don’t think he’s shaping up to be a good President, but he is still the President. A man who sits in the highest held office in the world. The commander of the largest and most advanced fighting force in the world. And when he tells kids to stay in school and do their best, they aught to be paying attention. He may not have the much potential for getting things done on capital hill, but he is and always has been a great speaker and motivational inspiration to others. I thought his speech today was right on target and offered a lot of down to earth advice for our future generation. Some have stated that this is just him playing up his hollywood side. But this was the time in technology to attempt a speech like this to a nation wide audience of students, and even if you don’t like Obama, you should understand that young people do like him. He speaks their language and uses their technology. If anyone can get through to troubled kids and make an impact, it would be someone like Obama. And good for him, for not ending the speech with “Vote for me in 2012!”

Rummy K Politics

Sunday, August 16th, 2009

I was watching the President give his town hall meeting in Grand Junction, Colorado. Obama really needs to do more stuff like this, because it is a lot easier to see where he is coming from. After seeing this speech, I am 90% the general idea of what is being proposed by Obama, although I doubt once it get’s through congress, it will be a much different beast. But I did gain a lot of insight of what it is that is keeping me from fully supporting the purposed reform. You can hear it in his response to some of the questions, which is why I’m embedding the video below.

First, I have to explain Rummy Kub, for those who don’t know it. It’s a game of matching numbers in order and by number. So you create groups of 3′s and colored ordered groups. As you play the game the table get’s filled with combinations that you can utlize and reorganize on your turn. Now the trick to Rummy Kub is that when it’s your turn, you have two minutes to move things around and attempt to place some of your pieces, the goal being to get rid of all your pieces. But if you are unable to find a home for all the displaces pieces in the two minutes, you are panelized and your turn is over.

When I hear Obama speak about health care reform, it feels like he is looking at the board, and he really feels as though all the pieces are there to make it possible. And it may be possible. But until we account for all the pieces of how this will happen, it’s kind of hard to judge the proposed system. It makes me wonder why we are proposing a system to the public that has a lot of empty holes in it. After all, he has more than two minutes to figure this out. Unless he wants it to push through fast for a reason. As a conservative skeptic, it would lead me to think that some of the true solutions to the problems are going to be hard to find supporters for, so if we get a rough plan approved without all the solutions specified, then it will be easier to pass the ugly solutions after we are already married to an overall plan.

Helping sick people makes me so ANGRY

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

I saw this video today. Some poeple are just looking for a chance to protest. I understand where these people are coming from, but I thought the point of a town hall meeting was to TALK about the issues. It seems kind of idiodic to show up screaming your case and acting uncivilized when this is an open opertunity to have your point heard and to bring other onto your team.

Government Run Healthcare

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

I’ve given the health care issue a lot of thought over the past month. In my opinion there are only two ways for a government to run a health care system. Option one is the one that most socialist countries have settled with. Offer crappy service at a price that everyone can afford and if you want better, you’ll have to travel to America or India to get that work done. In this option there would still be high end insurance coverage for those who can afford it, but because of high taxes, that would be a much smaller group of people then it is today. The other option is more of a totalitarian tought process. Do the math on who you can afford to cover, and then kill everyone else. It sounds harsh, but if you look at the long term result, you’ll see it’s true. Australia last year disallowed citizenship to a man because his child had autism. They stated that they just couldn’t afford to take on the financial “burden” of that illness. So they refused the entire family citizenship. Under a totalitarian government insurance plan, you would make abortion free and accessible, while telling parents who expect to have children with a medical disorder or health problem, that they may not be covered if they chose to go ahead and have the child. Euthanasia which was once abhorred by this country will become a viable option now that the government is tasked with caring for the elderly. You may disagree, and even I hope that such a thing would never happen. But when you start looking at the costs of health care and what people consider affordable health care to be. I can’t imagine how they will come up with a cheap solution that offers excellent service, without cutting a few corners. And by cutting corners, I mean genocide.

Now, I like Obama, at least as a person. I’m not sure how great of president he’ll be in the eyes of history. But I at least believe he is truely in his heart trying to do a good thing and help people who are hurting and financially destetute due to overwealming health care costs. What we have to remember is that Obama will only be president for a couple more years (fingers crossed) or even six more at most. After that another guy(/girl?) takes over, and then after that, another. What I’m getting at, is once you surrender certain freedoms to the control of the government, you don’t easly take them back. And once you take the problem of health care away from the poeple and the businesses who support the people and put it in the hands of polititions, you are making a long term choice that will effect generations to come. You don’t go from where we are now to soilent green in a matter of years. But if you start down that road now out of fear or apathy, we will find ourselves in a position of shame down the road.

The real solution to health care, in my mind at least, is a simple combonation of tort-reform and de-regulaiton of the healthcare industry. I also think that Insurance pools or coops would be a good solution for spreading out coverage costs. None of that involves giving the government more power over our lives.